Toward odds of kissing into target, you will find a significant communications ranging from grandiose narcissism and you can new member intercourse, ? = .161, t = dos.819, p = .005. So it correspondence are showed during the Fig dos. The easy slopes for males (effortless hill = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you may girls (simple slope = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) weren’t tall. Grandiose narcissists don’t display an elevated probability of kissing that have a connected address more a single one (? = .068, t = step 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not with the companion poaching to own a primary-identity fling.

Grandiose narcissists commonly declaration mate poaching -particularly for the new short-identity . Although not, a question stays as to whether they come across members of dating a great deal more value looking for than simply people who find themselves single. Widman and McNulty reason why grandiose narcissistic tendencies might be triggered across issues normally (such as the worry about-report off lifestyle incidence away from intimate conclusion), however feel triggered when placed in a particular disease. Hence, it will be easy one grandiose narcissists divulge a history of entertaining within the spouse poaching, but do not necessarily select those who work in relationship as better mates. I checked out this chance inside the five knowledge.

Partner poaching index.

For very long-identity mate poaching, grandiose narcissism try a life threatening predictor for females (? = .306, t = 2.623, p = .010) and a marginally tall predictor for men (? = .218, t = step 1.725, p = .088). Not one of Big Four variables was significant. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t a critical predictor away from victory during the poaching into the much time-term for men (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), however it are for ladies (? = .340, t = dos.369, p = .021). Nothing of the other variables was significant apart from women’s neuroticism; whenever women had been much more neurotic, they advertised even more achievement in the poaching for some time-identity intimate dating.

Efficiency

Of interest, grandiose narcissism wasn’t associated with the spouse poaching one of men. This result is in keeping with results advertised by the Kardum and you will colleagues https://datingranking.net/nudist-dating/. Therefore, it is possible one grandiose narcissistic women are with greater regularity guilty regarding partner poaching.

Materials and you will processes

There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.